Support and operations agents
Read a request, look up the customer’s records across your tools, act within set limits and pass anything unusual to a person.
We build agents that use your tools to reach a goal you set, and we put the tests, limits and approval steps in place before they touch real customers or real money.
An AI agent is a language model running in a loop: it plans a step, calls a tool such as a search, a database query or an API, looks at the result and decides what to do next, until the goal is met or it hits a limit. Unlike a workflow, the steps change from case to case. That makes agents more flexible, but also more expensive and harder to audit, so we only recommend one when a workflow can’t do the job.
Read a request, look up the customer’s records across your tools, act within set limits and pass anything unusual to a person.
Gather information from internal and public sources and write a brief with every claim linked to its source.
Carry out multi-step tasks in your admin panels and APIs that would otherwise take someone an afternoon of clicking.
Work through a case file, ask for what’s missing and prepare a decision for a person to approve.
An assistant your customers use, limited to the actions and data their own account allows.
A coordinator that splits a job between specialist agents and checks their work before anything is returned.
Every agent we build runs inside the same five-step loop. The approval step is what turns a demo into something you can leave running.
A request or an event sets the goal and the tools the agent may use.
The model picks the next step and the tool to call.
The tool runs with the agent’s permissions, never more.
Results are checked against rules, and step and spending limits are enforced.
Risky actions wait for a person, with the full trace attached.
If you can draw the process as a flowchart, you need a workflow: it’s cheaper, faster and easier to audit. You need an agent when each case needs different steps across several tools. We’ll tell you which during discovery, and most of the time it’s a workflow.
It only gets the tools and permissions the task needs. Limits on steps, spend and time end runaway runs, and anything risky waits for a person to approve it.
Against an evaluation set built from your real cases, before every release. We check whether it reached the right result, how many steps and how much money it took, and what it did when it couldn’t finish.
It depends on how many steps each run takes and which model it uses. We estimate a per-run cost during discovery, set a hard limit per run and track spend live after launch.
No. We use model providers and settings that do not train on your data, and we can run on models hosted in your own cloud when required.
Tell us what it is. Within 2 business days we'll reply with whether it needs custom software, an AI workflow or an agent, and roughly what it would take.